From our blog

The editor’s sampling of readers’ comments published by on pikecountycourier.com are republished here for the convenience of our newspaper readers. They are not subject to the Courier’s letter policy, which does not allow for anonymity. Some blogs are signed, some are not. Because they are already published, they are not edited, so bloggers, double-check your spelling. However our selection of comments will reflect the same rules of discretion used in the publication of letters. Several readers commented on our June 8 story, “No offense intended”. “Lee” wrote: I agree that there are more problems than were up here years ago. I think this area caters to full time commuters who leave their children to fend for themselves. Many children are left alone for more than 15 hours at a time with no adult supervision. Many are coming up from areas where they are used to all the amenities of a populated area. I am from New York and I can remember a time when you never saw liter in Pike County! I do not think Mr. Cavallaro’s comment was prejudical. I think that people are way too sensitive today. He has a right of freedom of speech and as a law enforcement official he probably knows where the issues are stemming from. “deanna margiore” wrote: “Thank you Mr. Cavallaro - apology accepted!” “1” wrote “‘The Courier’s account of his appearance prompted critical letters and blog comments ‘ — Gee, you think? I personally feel that the Courier played his comments up maybe possibly just a little bit to gain some readership. That’s not the role of a local newspaper. “Pat from New York” wrote: Just read your comment. We are from New York. We also own property in PA, have been coming here on weekends since 1979, and now that we’re retired, spend spring through fall in lovely PA. Let me just say that most New Yorkers are good, law-abiding people, just like most of you in PA. Yes, there is crime in NY .... but there is crime in PA too. To single out New Yorkers is downright wrong. Before blaming us, you should “clean your own house”. Some of you are afraid of change .... afraid an increase in PA population will destroy your lifestyle. You should learn to accept people from other walks of life and not point fingers as if everyone trying to enjoy your lovely state will wreck havic on it. Get to know your neighbors from New York, you’ll find out that they’re good, God-fearing, hard-working (or retired) nature-loving people like you. “Words destroy”.... ”understanding brings knowledge.” “Ray Liebold” wrote: Wow, Talk about open mouth insert foot. As a former NYC Police Officer, I was shocked, Not all New Yorkers are slobs or perps, yes there is some, but in a position that you hold, By Now you should know how to use the tool of communication. I found that by the way we speak can cause a bad situation to go worse or better. Hey just a little insite, there is good and bad in Harlem, queens, staten island and yes pike county. I Think your apology was so scripted, You should of just stood by your words, I would of had more respect for a man who backs up what he says, then one who girl scouts his way out. I still talk a long look when I see you guys on a car stop by yourself, and always will, Just to make sure you are ok. Responding to a June 8 letter, “Unspinning the review board spin”, “Greg Yetter” wrote: Barbara Devries makes some good points, but still does not address putting a modern looking building in a historic district. Concerning her mention of Turkey Hill; Its plans were approved before ARB was officially in existence. Concerning the Grand Union and Altec; neither are even in Milford Borough much less a historic district. Everyone wants the library. Everyone I’ve talked to does not want a building that looks like the one proposed by the library building committee. According to a discussion I had with Matt Osterberg, the library’s architect was invited to sit with the ARB before the design went to the drawing board. To date has the architect even consulted with ARB to see how his ideas mesh with existing laws (or not)? The answer to that question would speak volumes about his intent from the very beginning. Requiring the citizens of Milford to spend tax dollars on legal and professional services to defend its law does not make for a friendly neighbor. To quote a well known source, “He who wants friends must show himself friendly” Changing the discussion to one of environmentalism when the issue is about taking existing law into account is not intellectually honest. Does anyone advocating for this new structure see the underlying issue? Maybe this is a severe case of the Emperor’s new clothes. Responding to “Repair funding: a heavy weight for historic bridge”, “Steve Lindsey of Keene, NH” wrote: “Looks like the county doesn’t like living up to its obligations ... History and local sentiment doesn’t matter to such minions...” Several readers commented on our June 8 story, “No offense intended”. “Lee” wrote: I agree that there are more problems than were up here years ago. I think this area caters to full time commuters who leave their children to fend for themselves. Many children are left alone for more than 15 hours at a time with no adult supervision. Many are coming up from areas where they are used to all the amenities of a populated area. I am from New York and I can remember a time when you never saw liter in Pike County! I do not think Mr. Cavallaro’s comment was prejudical. I think that people are way too sensitive today. He has a right of freedom of speech and as a law enforcement official he probably knows where the issues are stemming from. “deanna margiore” wrote: “Thank you Mr. Cavallaro - apology accepted!” “1” wrote “‘The Courier’s account of his appearance prompted critical letters and blog comments ‘ — Gee, you think? I personally feel that the Courier played his comments up maybe possibly just a little bit to gain some readership. That’s not the role of a local newspaper. “Pat from New York” wrote: Just read your comment. We are from New York. We also own property in PA, have been coming here on weekends since 1979, and now that we’re retired, spend spring through fall in lovely PA. Let me just say that most New Yorkers are good, law-abiding people, just like most of you in PA. Yes, there is crime in NY .... but there is crime in PA too. To single out New Yorkers is downright wrong. Before blaming us, you should “clean your own house”. Some of you are afraid of change .... afraid an increase in PA population will destroy your lifestyle. You should learn to accept people from other walks of life and not point fingers as if everyone trying to enjoy your lovely state will wreck havic on it. Get to know your neighbors from New York, you’ll find out that they’re good, God-fearing, hard-working (or retired) nature-loving people like you. “Words destroy”.... ”understanding brings knowledge.” “Ray Liebold” wrote: Wow, Talk about open mouth insert foot. As a former NYC Police Officer, I was shocked, Not all New Yorkers are slobs or perps, yes there is some, but in a position that you hold, By Now you should know how to use the tool of communication. I found that by the way we speak can cause a bad situation to go worse or better. Hey just a little insite, there is good and bad in Harlem, queens, staten island and yes pike county. I Think your apology was so scripted, You should of just stood by your words, I would of had more respect for a man who backs up what he says, then one who girl scouts his way out. I still talk a long look when I see you guys on a car stop by yourself, and always will, Just to make sure you are ok. Responding to a June 8 letter, “Unspinning the review board spin”, “Greg Yetter” wrote: Barbara Devries makes some good points, but still does not address putting a modern looking building in a historic district. Concerning her mention of Turkey Hill; Its plans were approved before ARB was officially in existence. Concerning the Grand Union and Altec; neither are even in Milford Borough much less a historic district. Everyone wants the library. Everyone I’ve talked to does not want a building that looks like the one proposed by the library building committee. According to a discussion I had with Matt Osterberg, the library’s architect was invited to sit with the ARB before the design went to the drawing board. To date has the architect even consulted with ARB to see how his ideas mesh with existing laws (or not)? The answer to that question would speak volumes about his intent from the very beginning. Requiring the citizens of Milford to spend tax dollars on legal and professional services to defend its law does not make for a friendly neighbor. To quote a well known source, “He who wants friends must show himself friendly” Changing the discussion to one of environmentalism when the issue is about taking existing law into account is not intellectually honest. Does anyone advocating for this new structure see the underlying issue? Maybe this is a severe case of the Emperor’s new clothes. Responding to “Repair funding: a heavy weight for historic bridge”, “Steve Lindsey of Keene, NH” wrote: “Looks like the county doesn’t like living up to its obligations ... History and local sentiment doesn’t matter to such minions...”